15. However, the picture just given would be incomplete if one failed
to add to the "economic and social indices" of underdevelopment other
indices which are equally negative and indeed even more disturbing,
beginning with the cultural level. These are illiteracy, the difficulty or
impossibility of obtaining higher education, the inability to share in the
building of one's own nation, the various forms of exploitation and of
economic, social, political and even religious oppression of the
individual and his or her rights, discrimination of every type, especially
the exceptionally odious form based on difference of race. If some of
these scourges are noted with regret in areas of the more developed North,
they are undoubtedly more frequent, more lasting and more difficult to
root out in the developing and less advanced countries.
It should be noted that in today's world, among other rights, the right
of economic initiative is often suppressed. Yet it is a right which is
important not only for the individual but also for the common good.
Experience shows us that the denial of this right, or its limitation in
the name of an alleged "equality" of everyone in society, diminishes, or
in practice absolutely destroys the spirit of initiative, that is to say
the creative subjectivity of the citizen. As a consequence, there arises,
not so much a true equality as a "leveling down." In the place of creative
initiative there appears passivity, dependence and submission to the
bureaucratic apparatus which, as the only "ordering" and "decision-making"
body - if not also the "owner"- of the entire totality of goods and the
means of production, puts everyone in a position of almost absolute
dependence, which is similar to the traditional dependence of the
worker-proletarian in capitalism. This provokes a sense of frustration or
desperation and predisposes people to opt out of national life, impelling
many to emigrate and also favoring a form of "psychological" emigration.
Such a situation has its consequences also from the point of view of
the "rights of the individual nations." In fact, it often happens that a
nation is deprived of its subjectivity, that is to say the "sovereignty"
which is its right, in its economic, political-social and in a certain way
cultural significance, since in a national community all these dimensions
of life are bound together.
It must also be restated that no social group, for example a political
party, has the right to usurp the role of sole leader, since this brings
about the destruction of the true subjectivity of society and of the
individual citizens, as happens in every form of totalitarianism. In this
situation the individual and the people become "objects," in spite of all
declarations to the contrary and verbal assurances.
We should add here that in today's world there are many other forms of
poverty. For are there not certain privations or deprivations which
deserve this name? The denial or the limitation of human rights - as for
example the right to religious freedom, the right to share in the building
of society, the freedom to organize and to form unions, or to take
initiatives in economic matters - do these not impoverish the human person
as much as, if not more than, the deprivation of material goods? And is
development which does not take into account the full affirmation of these
rights really development on the human level?
In brief, modern underdevelopment is not only economic but also
cultural, political and simply human, as was indicated twenty years ago by
the Encyclical Populorum Progressio. Hence at this point we have to
ask ourselves if the sad reality of today might not be, at least in part,
the result of a too narrow idea of development, that is, a mainly economic
one.
24. If arms production is a serious disorder in the present world with
regard to true human needs and the employment of the means capable of
satisfying those needs, the arms trade is equally to blame. Indeed, with
reference to the latter it must be added that the moral judgment is even
more severe. As we all know, this is a trade without frontiers capable of
crossing even the barriers of the blocs. It knows how to overcome the
division between East and West, and above all the one between North and
South, to the point - and this is more serious - of pushing its way into
the different sections which make up the southern hemisphere. We are thus
confronted with a strange phenomenon: while economic aid and development
plans meet with the obstacle of insuperable ideological barriers, and with
tariff and trade barriers, arms of whatever origin circulate with almost
total freedom all over the world And as the recent document of the
Pontifical Commission Iustitia et Pax on the international debt points
out,(42) everyone knows that in certain cases the capital lent by the
developed world has been used in the underdeveloped world to buy weapons.
If to all this we add the tremendous and universally acknowledged
danger represented by atomic weapons stockpiled on an incredible scale,
the logical conclusion seems to be this: in today's world, including the
world of economics, the prevailing picture is one destined to lead us more
quickly towards death rather than one of concern for true development
which would lead all towards a "more human" life, as envisaged by the
Encyclical Populorum Progressio.(43)
The consequences of this state of affairs are to be seen in the
festering of a wound which typifies and reveals the imbalances and
conflicts of the modern world: the millions of refugees whom war, natural
calamities, persecution and discrimination of every kind have deprived of
home, employment, family and homeland. The tragedy of these multitudes is
reflected in the hopeless faces of men, women and children who can no
longer find a home in a divided and inhospitable world.
Nor may we close our eyes to another painful wound in today's world:
the phenomenon of terrorism, understood as the intention to kill people
and destroy property indiscriminately, and to create a climate of terror
and insecurity, often including the taking of hostages. Even when some
ideology or the desire to create a better society is adduced as the
motivation for this inhuman behavior, acts of terrorism are never
justifiable. Even less so when, as happens today, such decisions and such
actions, which at times lead to real massacres, and to the abduction of
innocent people who have nothing to do with the conflicts, claim to have a
propaganda purpose for furthering a cause. It is still worse when they are
an end in themselves, so that murder is committed merely for the sake of
killing. In the face of such horror and suffering, the words I spoke some
years ago are still true, and I wish to repeat them again: "What
Christianity forbids is to seek solutions...by the ways of hatred, by the
murdering of defenseless people, by the methods of terrorism."(44)